I know my previous post on chapel wasn't entirely positive and maybe that caused some concern. But I want to make it clear that chapel has been going really well. It really has. I have the unfortunate tendency to take a rather cynical point of view sometimes. But honestly, if I were in the student's shoes, I would not want to be there! Get up early so I can sit through some boring worship service that I don't understand and don't identify with? I mean, let's be real. The nursing students are, thankfully, very respectful. In return, my hope is to make it all as painless as possible. And I am being tentative about it and trying to be culturally sensitive. I think there are a couple of fallacies about religion and culture. 1) That they are synonymous and 2) that they can be completely divorced from one another. I don't think either is true.
That means that, in my view, Christianity is not "American," or even "Western," although it has certainly helped shape these cultures. But we march in to other cultures with our worship songs and our cultural interpretations of the gospel and end up making people become not just Christian, but our "brand" of Christian. Khao jai mai? And sometimes it's just laughable. For instance, you can't (according to Rob) really translate a lot of the traditional western hymns into Thai because the notes don't follow the Thai tones. I guess some of the translations are pretty painful. But to say that religion has nothing to do with culture, that it doesn't change culture, is ridiculous. I can't convert to another religion and keep my former culture entirely intact. so once again, we have a question of values. Who determines them and how do we apply them to life? If I value cultural diversity over all else, I'm going to have little patience with missionaries and English teachers and "destroyers of culture." If I value my faith over culture, I'm not going to have many scruples about how my actions affect cultural diversity. To say that people with these different sets of values can come to a mutual agreement is completely unrealistic. And that is often the two types of people who rub shoulders in Thailand.
And thus I find myself trying to tread lightly. When we were trying to translate my homily into Thai, Ozzie made the observation that the dictionary had a lot of religious words and also a lot of words related to sex. Basically, the writers know the types of farang who are coming to Thailand. Now, wouldn't it be awful if it was the sex tourists who displayed an interest in Thai culture and made more of an effort to understand it while the Christian missionaries simply ignored it all in their drive to convert people? As an outsider, what would you think? To be clear, I don't consider myself to be here as a "missionary" any more than I consider myself to be "missionary" in the u.s. But I do consider myself a Christian. And as such I am representing something. someone in fact. And so I have to be careful.
That means that, in my view, Christianity is not "American," or even "Western," although it has certainly helped shape these cultures. But we march in to other cultures with our worship songs and our cultural interpretations of the gospel and end up making people become not just Christian, but our "brand" of Christian. Khao jai mai? And sometimes it's just laughable. For instance, you can't (according to Rob) really translate a lot of the traditional western hymns into Thai because the notes don't follow the Thai tones. I guess some of the translations are pretty painful. But to say that religion has nothing to do with culture, that it doesn't change culture, is ridiculous. I can't convert to another religion and keep my former culture entirely intact. so once again, we have a question of values. Who determines them and how do we apply them to life? If I value cultural diversity over all else, I'm going to have little patience with missionaries and English teachers and "destroyers of culture." If I value my faith over culture, I'm not going to have many scruples about how my actions affect cultural diversity. To say that people with these different sets of values can come to a mutual agreement is completely unrealistic. And that is often the two types of people who rub shoulders in Thailand.
And thus I find myself trying to tread lightly. When we were trying to translate my homily into Thai, Ozzie made the observation that the dictionary had a lot of religious words and also a lot of words related to sex. Basically, the writers know the types of farang who are coming to Thailand. Now, wouldn't it be awful if it was the sex tourists who displayed an interest in Thai culture and made more of an effort to understand it while the Christian missionaries simply ignored it all in their drive to convert people? As an outsider, what would you think? To be clear, I don't consider myself to be here as a "missionary" any more than I consider myself to be "missionary" in the u.s. But I do consider myself a Christian. And as such I am representing something. someone in fact. And so I have to be careful.



